Opgavebeskrivelse
Jeg har valgt at fokusere på at gøre diskussionen mere fyldestgørende end forrige aflevering samt strukturen og konklusionen. (har primært svært ved midterdelen og pee-structure så gerne meget feedback her)
Indledning
Hello everyone! I am happy to be invited to speak to you today. My name is Bonnie Parker, and I am a member of the debate team at my university. I’m glad I have gotten the chance to come here and talk about the gun control in the US.
Firstly, I will be accounting for and commenting on different views on gun control in the US.
Then I will try to discuss whether it is possible to restrict the access to guns in the US. And finally, I will sum up.
Optimer dit sprog - Læs vores guide og scor topkarakter
Uddrag
On one hand, some Americans believe that to make America’s future safe only one right comes into play. The right to bear arms.
They believe that if the Second Amendment is lost, America will completely be lost as well.
Children must be taught about the gun culture in their country. This is best taught on a gun range, where the little kids should be pulling the triggers in a controlled environment where the parents can teach them basic gun safety and how to handle firearms.
On the other hand, some believe that the gun access should be completely banned, and that America needs new gun laws .
A very common argument to why guns should be allowed is “Guns do not kill people, people kill people” This is not a good argument; in fact, a very terrible one.
The issue is not whether guns can kill people on their own. It involves how easy a weapon makes killing. A man walked into a school in 2013 in China, just some hours before the Sandy Hook shooting in the US and started stabbing everyone in his vicinity.
The killer in the US killed 20 children and six adults, by contrast, the Chinese murderer used a knife and none of the 20 kids he stabbed had died.
Effective gun laws prevented the Chinese murderer from obtaining a gun, with which he would have done much more damage.
Skriv et svar